Up a level | ||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Argentina | Bolivia | Chile | Colombia | Costa Rica | Cuba | Dominican Rep. | Ecuador | El Salvador | Guatemala | Honduras |
Up a level | ||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Mexico | Morocco | Guinea | Nicaragua | Panama | Paraguay | Peru | Philippines | Puerto Rico | Uruguay | Venezuela |
I have brought these prices up to date and added currency selection. I have made some additions in places, to avoid confusion, I have given these RH numbers (Revised Hiscocks). 'RH' numbers are the same as 'H' numbers otherwise CheckList Setup |
Contributors: |
Shortcuts to different sections | |||||
National | Punch Cancels | Regional | Railway | Correos y Telegrafos | Stationery |
Steve Hiscocks wrote:
Argentinian telegraph stamps are of three types: national, regional and railway. The early national stamps are best known because they were also
used for postage from the end of 1888 to 1892. Postally used copies bear the usual small circular date stamp in black while telegraphically used
copies may be pen cancelled but are more often cancelled with black, purple or blue rectangular or oval hand stamps. It is not known for how long
the first issue remained in telegraphic use. In 1930 two further sets appeared, one of which was not apparently used. Both show vertical two-part
designs and were apparently intended to be used across the message/receipt division and to be cut in half as were those of India, Uganda, Ceylon,
Sudan, etc. It is not known for how long these stamps remained in use.
The regional and railway issues show a strong family resemblance and were all produced by the same printers at about the same time. Most were
on Spicer Brothers paper bearing a sheet watermark and show part of this watermark in a minority of cases. Sources differ on the list of private
railway companies issuing stamps. Morley quotes the 'Telegrafo Rio Uruguay et Ferrocarril Central Argentino' which is not mentioned in later
listings while the 'Ferrocarril Oeste Santafecino' is not mentioned in early sources. The use of railway telegraph stamps apparently ceased at
the end of 1894. Further information is needed.
My notes:
The first 1930 issue was actually issued for a short space of time. I have only seen one used example, on a receipt of 24 October 1930.
I have now added an image of a proof of this. Argentina was linked to Europe by cable in 1910.
1887 (8 December) Lithographed by Juan H. Kidd y Cia, Buenos Aires. White wove paper.
No watermark or papermakers' watermark (W1) in sheet. Line-perf. 11½
I find these rather puzzling. Supposedly they were both printed by the same printer and are dated about the same, but they are a different design and printed on different paper. Taking the information from Kneitschel Vol.2, Pg 525: Type-I is on hard paper with the paper manufacturer's sheet watermark visible on some stamps (shown below). Type-II is on ordinary paper. Note Steve Hiscocks' warning about the red ink running if soaked too much. The hard paper of Type-I gives better quality printing. Why have two slightly different designs being printed concurrently, but studiously sticking to different paper for each ? The only reason I can think of is that they may have been printed in different places, one with access to Spicer paper, and the other not. Why different designs? No idea unless they wanted to be able to distinguish between them. There is a similar situation with the stamps of Ferrocarril Santa Fè A Las Colonias where again there are two designs and two paper types, though here there is only a small difference in types, with a difference of red shade It is possible that other stamps were done the same way, but with no difference of design. These were also used for postage from the end of 1888 to 1892. Postage stamps inscribed 'CORREOS Y TELEGRAFOS' were also issued from 1888 to 1890 (3 sets). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(Hiscocks Type 1) - H1 | (Hiscocks Type 3) - H3 | (Hiscocks Type 2) - H2 | (Hiscocks Type 4) - H4 |
Type-II - Ordinary paper, no watermark. | Type-I - Hard paper, sometimes watermark. |
Image taken from Hiscocks page 2.
Hisc. | Type. | Description | Mint | Used |
---|---|---|---|---|
H1 | II | 10c dull scarlet | 2.20 | 1.00 |
H2 | I | 10c dull scarlet | 2.20 | 1.00 |
H2a | showing part of sheet watermark | 3.50 | 1.50 | |
H3 | II | 40c deep blue | 3.50 | 1.50 |
H3a | indigo | 3.50 | 1.50 | |
H4 | I | 40c deep blue | 4.00 | 2.00 |
H4a | showing part of sheet watermark | 5.00 | 3.00 | |
H4b | indigo | 4.00 | 2.00 | |
H4c | indigo, showing part of sheet watermark | 5.00 | 3.00 | |
H4d | imperf. between horizontal pair | - | - |
Hiscocks added the following 3 notes:
Note 1. The red ink used for Nos. 1 and 2 is not fully water-fast and soaking leads to diffusion of colour. It seems probable that the "on tinted paper" variety listed by Morley is due to this and I have not therefore listed it myself. |
Note 2. The use of these stamps apparently ceased in 1896. |
Note 3. Telegraphically used copies are cancelled with a rectangular or oval stamp in black or purple or occasionally by pen. Postally used copies are more common and are usually cancelled with a small circular date stamp. |
My Note: Type I has a centre that varies in vertical position with respect to the frame.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
H2 - a 1.8mm frame to sun | H2 - b 1.8mm frame to sun + frame break | H2 - c 2.1mm frame to sun + frame break |
The frame break indicated is on 5 out of 11 examples of H2, including on 2 out of a strip of 3 stamps.
The spots at the bottom is on 2 out of the 5 with frame breaks and on only that one (H2-a) of the 6 without the frame break.
I only have 2 examples of H4, one measures 1.35mm, the other 1.7mm. Neither has the frame break or spots.
1930 Lithographed by Casa de Moneda of Buenos Aires. White wove paper.
Watermark Sun (W2) Sideways. Hiscocks and Kneitschel give these as Perf. 13 x 12½. However Guillermo Jalil gives these as Perf. 12¾ x 12¼
My pair of 10c + Selvedge shown below shows it is variable within the sheet depending on where measured. Horizontally gauging from 12.7 to 13.0, vertically about 12¼
This is a combination of Hiscocks page 3 and part of a proof shown below.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1c Specimen | 2c Specimen | 3c Specimen | 4c Specimen | 6c Specimen |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
7c Specimen | 9c Specimen | 10c Specimen | 20c Specimen | 40c Specimen |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
50c Specimen | 60c Specimen | 70c Specimen - double impression | 80c Specimen | 90c Specimen |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1p Specimen | 2p Specimen | 3p Specimen | 4p Specimen | 5p Specimen |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
6p Specimen | 7p Specimen | 8p Specimen | 9p Specimen | 10p Specimen |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
20p Specimen | 30p Specimen | 40p Specimen | 50p Specimen |
Here are the first five of the set. Many of these appear to suffer from surface rubbing.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
H5 - 3c from RL. | H6 - 4c one of mine. | H7 - 5c from RL. |
![]() |
![]() |
H8 - 10c one of mine. | H9 - 30c courtesy of Paul & Les Bottomley. |
Hisc. | Type. | Description | Mint | Used |
---|---|---|---|---|
H5 | 5 | 3c blue | 7.00 | - |
H6 | 5 | 4c yellow-green | 7.30 | - |
H7 | 5 | 5c lilac | 7.50 | - |
H8 | 5 | 10c orange | 8.00 | - |
H9 | 5 | 30c ochre | 8.50 | - |
H10 | 5 | 40c bistre | 8.80 | - |
H11 | 5 | 50c blue-green | 9.00 | - |
H12 | 5 | 80c reddish lilac | 9.50 | - |
H13 | 5 | 90c brown | 10.00 | - |
Additional values I have seen as imperf. proofs/colour trials. Kneitschel also lists a 50P light chestnut which I have not seen.
1930 Different design. As above. White wove paper. Hiscocks and Kneitschel give these as Perf. 12½ x 13½ or perf. 13½.
However Guillermo Jalil gives these as Perf. 11¼ x 13¼, 12½ x 11¼, 12½ x 13¼, 13¼ x 11¼ or 13¼
My own examples show that the perforations are rather uneven so that the measurement on a single stamp may depend on where you measure it.
Also some of the perforations are very ragged, leading to guesswork.
It is uncertain what these are, Essays? Proofs? They appear to be in the issued colours of type 6. With the large number of values, some are very similar shades.
Image courtesy of Marcelo Trejo of Corpmet on Delcampe.
These were meant to be used in such a way that the top part was left on the receipt and the bottom was on the telegram with the message, to be later pulped.
They each have in red across the top-left corner the words "Este recibo no tiene valor si no lleva adherido en timbres telegraficos el importe abonado"
meaning "This receipt has no value if the amount paid has not been attached in telegraph stamps".
This is in green (Form 144/3006) with the additional words "Por el excedente" meaning (I think) "For the excess", with only 6c to cover some extra charge.
Dated 1st August 1930. Half-sized image from RL.
This (half-size) image dated 22 September 1930 ("Fórm. 3004/143 / 20.000 B-930"), shows a receipt with 1P34c in stamps.
This shows a marked area for the top halves, and presumably there was a larger area for the bottom halves.
From this, you would expect used halves to be only from the top halves. However, a batch of used halves that I bought contained a lot of bottom halves.
Since then I have found further examples. Several used bottom halves with clear dates are dated July 1930.
This suggests that they came from used telegraph forms. Here is a table of the used halves:
The 10c is the odd one out, the used bottom halves also included three pairs.
There were no pairs among the rest. Bottom halves, being about twice the size and 'liberated', would seem to be more desirable.
I have added pricing for them in the listing.
Hiscocks added the following note:
Note. I have been able to find little information on these stamps. Specifically it is not clear whether they were all issued in both perforations or whether some were one and some the other. I would also like to know how long they remained in use. |
John Barefoot does not list the 6c or 7c of the above. I have used 6c examples but not 7c, 8c or 9c. It is possibly a mistake or oversight.
I understand that these are #14-45 in some other (unspecified) catalogue. I will continue to list them as Hiscocks did until I know otherwise.
Used bottom-half examples:
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1c H14. Perf 13 x 13½ | 2c H15. Perf 12½ x 13¼ | 3c H16. Perf 12½ x 13½ | 4c H17. Perf 12½ x 13¼ | 5c H18. Perf 12½ x 13 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
6c H19. Perf 12½ x 13¼ | 10c H23. Perf 13½ | 20c H24. Perf 12½ x 13½ | 30c H25. Perf 12½ x 13¼ | 40c H26. Perf 12½ x 13¼ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
50c H27. Perf 13¼ x 11½ | 60c H28. Perf 12½ x 13¼ | 80c H30. Perf 12½ x 13½ | 1p H32. Perf 12½ x 11½ | 2p H33. Perf 13½ ? |
Victor Kneitschel in Volume II of his catalogue (Edition 6, page 548) listed 7 different typos.
Kneitschel Type I, 10mm high "T", without postmark. Correos y Telégrafos (in stencil letters) thought to have been used in Buenos Aires, 1892 - 1899. Possibly primarily on high values. Images courtesy of Jeff Turnbull. |
||
![]() |
Kneitschel Type II, 5-pointed star, 12mm diameter without postmark. | |
![]() |
Kneitschel Type III, 2-rows of horizontal perforation, Perf.10½, with or without postmark. | |
![]() |
Kneitschel Type IV, 4½mm hole, generally without postmark. | |
![]() |
Kneitschel Type V, "INUTILIZADO" horizontal, vertical or diagonal, simple, inverted or double, usually about 4 letters per stamp. Letters 14½mm high. With or without postmark. Kneitschel Type Va, as above but with a pen or coloured pencil stroke as an additional control. |
|
![]() |
Kneitschel Type VI, "CHANCELADO", horizontal or diagonal, height 9½mm. Generally with boxed postmark. |
|
![]() |
Kneitschel Type VII, 9mm high numbers representing the date. Generally with boxed postmark.. |
1888-1890 Lithographed by Juan H. Kidd y Cia, Buenos Aires. White wove paper.
No watermark or papermakers' watermark (W1). Line-perf. 11½
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Type 7 - H46, courtesy of Guillermo Jalil | Type 7 - H47 | Type 7 - H48, courtesy of Guillermo Jalil | Type 7 - H49 |
RH # | Hisc. | Type. | Description | Mint | Used |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
RH46 | H46 | 7 | 1c dull blue (1 July 1890) | 12.00 | 12.00 |
*RH46a | - | showing part of sheet watermark | 20.00 | 20.00 | |
RH47 | H47 | 7 | 2c rose (shades) (1 July 1890) | 12.00 | 12.00 |
*RH47a | - | showing part of sheet watermark | 20.00 | 20.00 | |
RH48 | H48 | 7 | 10c yellowish brown (1888) | 15.00 | 15.00 |
RH48a | H48a | showing part of sheet watermark | 20.00 | 20.00 | |
RH49 | H49 | 7 | 40c orange (1888) | 16.00 | 16.00 |
RH49a | H49a | showing part of sheet watermark | 20.00 | 20.00 |
* I have added these as they are reported by Guillermo Jalil
Hiscocks added the following note:
Note. The use of these stamps was apparently discontinued in 1890. |
This had me puzzled a value of 1 Peso, dated 1881 with symbolism suggesting something to do with
radio communication or telegraphy to or between ships.
Ernesto Lopez tells me it is a revenue stamp of 1879, and that there were similar Bolivian stamps.
1891 Lithographed by Juan H. Kidd y Cia, Buenos Aires. White wove paper.
Sheet watermark (W1). Line-perf. 11½
Type 8, courtesy of Guillermo Jalil |
Hisc. | Type. | Description | Mint | Used |
---|---|---|---|---|
H50 | 8 | 10c blue | 75.00 | 60.00 |
H50a | with circular violet control on reverse | 300.00 | 300.00 | |
H50b | showing part of sheet watermark | 90.00 | 75.00 | |
H51 | 8 | 40c greenish blue | 75.00 | 60.00 |
H51a | with circular violet control on reverse | 300.00 | 300.00 | |
H51b | showing part of sheet watermark | 90.00 | 75.00 |
1888 Lithographed by Juan H. Kidd y Cia, Buenos Aires. White wove paper.
No watermark. Perf. 11½
This used price should be considered as being for no-gum or pen-cancelled only.
It is thought that the illustrated example was probably cancelled "by favour".
An article by Humberto Brumatti (F.A.E.F. No.127 Jan-Mar 2010) includes (translated from Spanish) :
Walter Bose, citing as a source "La Revista Postal" Nº 4, year 1898, published in Buenos Aires, from the Entre Ríos Province Telegraph, refers:
"It issued two values: 10 cents, brown, and 40 cents, light blue; printed in lithography by the Kraft house, from Buenos Aires, in 1888. They bear the provincial "shield" as their emblem.
"The stamps were never put into operation, because when they arrived in Entre Ríos, the (Provincial) Government, for unknown reasons, did not release them to the public,
and a short time later they were destroyed by fire. Only a few sheets could be saved of the voracious element which, either out of curiosity or novelty, ended up in the hands
of some high-ranking employees of the branch offices. Of the value of 40 cents, no copy is known; only the 10-cent one still exists."
A proof of the 40c survived, last known to be in the possession of Nestor Paván. Current whereabouts unknown.
In view of this, it is perhaps surprising that used examples exist at all. Perhaps they are under-valued. Does anyone reading this have a 40c light blue ?
There may actually be a good reason why the stamps were not released to the public.
The 10c and 40c values reflect a convention established on August 5, 1887 of 40c for the first ten words of text or fraction and 10c for each group or fraction of five subsequent words.
However, the National Postal and Telegraphic Rates Law approved on November 7, 1889, to be in force during 1890, provided:
"Art. 3) The telegraphic offices that are issued by the national lines, will pay the following rate:
A fixed right of 30 cents for each dispatch, whatever its length, and two cents for each word of text."
Fore-knowledge of the impending change may have been the problem.
Shortcuts to different sections | ||||||
Andino | Argentino del Este | Buenos Aires al Pacifico | Buenos Aires y Puerto de La Ensenada | Central Norte | Gran Oeste Argentino | Oeste Santafecino |
Santa Fè A Las Colonias | Telegráfica del Rio de la Plata | Telegrafo Rio Uruguay et Ferrocarril Central Argentino | Telegrafo Trasandino |
1887 Typographed & Lithographed by Juan H. Kidd y Cia, Buenos Aires. White wove paper.
No watermark or papermakers' watermark (W1). Line-perf. 11½
Type 10, courtesy of Guillermo Jalil |
Hisc. | Type. | Description | Mint | Used |
---|---|---|---|---|
H53 | 10 | 10c grey-black | 80.00 | - |
H53a | showing part of sheet watermark | 100.00 | - | |
H54 | 10 | 40c light blue | 80.00 | - |
H54a | showing part of sheet watermark | 100.00 | - |
Hiscocks added the following note:
Note. Different sources quote different colours for No. 53 — green or grey — but the majority give grey. |
1887 As above. Line-perf. 11½
Type 11, courtesy of Guillermo Jalil |
Hisc. | Type. | Description | Mint | Used |
---|---|---|---|---|
H55 | 11 | 10c blue-green | 90.00 | - |
H55a | showing part of sheet watermark | 112.00 | - | |
H56 | 11 | 40c red-brown | 90.00 | - |
H56a | showing part of sheet watermark | 112.00 | - |
Hiscocks added the following note:
Note. Different sources again quote different colours for No. 55 — black or blue-green. One assumes the black copy reported was a proof. |
1887 As above. Line-perf. 11½
![]() |
![]() |
Type 12 - H57 | Type 12 - H58 |
Hisc. | Type. | Description | Mint | Used |
---|---|---|---|---|
H57 | 12 | 10c light brown | 6.00 | - |
H57a | showing part of sheet watermark | 7.50 | - | |
H58 | 12 | 40c blue | 6.00 | - |
H58a | showing part of sheet watermark | 7.50 | - |
1887 As above. Line-perf. 11½
Type 13, courtesy of Guillermo Jalil |
Hisc. | Type. | Description | Mint | Used |
---|---|---|---|---|
H59 | 13 | 10c carmine | 90.00 | - |
H59a | showing part of sheet watermark | 110.00 | - | |
H60 | 13 | 40c yellow-brown | 90.00 | - |
H60a | showing part of sheet watermark | 110.00 | - |
Hiscocks added the following note:
Note. Morley mistakenly quotes the name as Euscuada. |
1887 As above. Line-perf. 11½
![]() |
![]() |
Type 14 - H61 | Type 14 - H62 |
Hisc. | Type. | Description | Mint | Used |
---|---|---|---|---|
H61 | 14 | 10c blue | 6.00 | - |
H61a | showing part of sheet watermark | 7.50 | - | |
H62 | 14 | 40c violet | 6.00 | - |
H62a | showing part of sheet watermark | 7.50 | - |
Juan H. Kidd & Co., imprint reconstruction from two pieces. Image courtesy of treasurings-jewelry.
1887 As above. Line-perf. 11½
Type 15, courtesy of Guillermo Jalil. |
Hisc. | Type. | Description | Mint | Used |
---|---|---|---|---|
H63 | 15 | 10c red-brown | 105.00 | - |
H63a | showing part of sheet watermark | 130.00 | - | |
H64 | 15 | 40c orange-red | 105.00 | - |
H64a | showing part of sheet watermark | 130.00 | - |
1887 As above. No watermark. Line-perf. 11½
Type 16, courtesy of Guillermo Jalil. |
Hisc. | Type. | Description | Mint | Used |
---|---|---|---|---|
H65 | 16 | 40c vermilion | 120.00 | - |
H65a | imperf. between horizontal pair | 400.00 | - |
1887 As above. Perf. 11½. Of two types — with and without an accent over the 'A' — 18 & 17 respectively.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
H66 Type 17 10c without accent | H67 Type (18) 10c with accent | H68 Type (17) 40c without accent | H69 Type 18 40c with accent |
Strangely the stamps with the accents are slightly larger (measuring the design portion) than the others.
The difference is quite small, from 0.013 to 0.016 inches (0.34 to 0.4 mm). These sizes are averaged over a number of stamps and
there is a similar variation within groups, but the differences are consistent.
This may be because they were on different paper, having different wetting/drying (gumming, stamp removal) characteristics.
The first issue was on (more expensive ?) Spicer Brothers paper, then the accents were added and subsequent printings done on (cheaper ?) unwatermarked paper.
I am assuming that the accent should have been there and was added as a correction. If this is the case, then the same sequence would follow for the first National stamps.
Hiscocks added the following note:
Note. Nos. 67 and 69 do not exhibit a sheet watermark. |
My note: Hiscocks seems to have got H68 and H69 reversed. I corrected.
See my notes about H1-H4 at the beginning.
1887 As above. Line-perf. 11½
Type 19, courtesy of Guillermo Jalil. |
Hisc. | Type. | Description | Mint | Used |
---|---|---|---|---|
H70 | 19 | 10c orange (shades) | 105.00 | - |
H70a | showing part of sheet watermark | 125.00 | - | |
H71 | 19 | 40c grey | 105.00 | - |
H71a | showing part of sheet watermark | 125.00 | - |
1887 As above? Perf. 11½?
H73 Proof, courtesy of John Barefoot. |
Hisc. | Type. | Description | Mint | Used |
---|---|---|---|---|
H72 | 10c | - | - | |
H73 | 40c | - | - |
Hiscocks added the following note:
Note. These stamps are listed by Morley but their existence needs confirmation and no further details are known. |
1887 As above. Line-perf. 11½. Sheets of 100 stamps.
Type 20, courtesy of Guillermo Jalil. |
Hisc. | Type. | Description | Mint | Used |
---|---|---|---|---|
H74 | 20 | 10c carmine | 100.00 | - |
H74a | showing part of sheet watermark | 120.00 | - | |
H74b | with control stamp on reverse | 250.00 | - | |
H75 | 20 | 40c orange | 100.00 | - |
H75a | with circular violet control on reverse | 120.00 | - | |
H75b | with control stamp on reverse | 250.00 | - |
Hiscocks added the following 2 notes:
Note 1. The name Trasandino means "across the Andes" and the stamps were used for. international telegraphs between Argentina and Chile. |
Note 2. The control stamps on Nos. 74b and 75b consist of the words. "TELEGRAFO TRASANDINO / INSPECCION / REPUBCA ARGENTINA" in an oval. |
From 1888 to 1892 stamps inscribed "Correos y Telegrafos" were use to pre-pay charges for both postage and telegraph use.
These were not listed by Steve Hiscocks, but I will list them since people have shown an interest in them.
Generally though it is not possible to know which of the two possibilities the used stamps had.
All images in this section are courtesy of Rolf Lamprecht.
1888/9 Perf. 11½ or 11½ x 12.
RH-PT1. | RH-PT1a. | RH-PT2. |
RH-PT3. | RH-PT4. | RH-PT5. |
RH # | Type. | Description | Mint | Used |
---|---|---|---|---|
RH PT1 | ½c ultramarine | 0.60 | 0.40 | |
RH PT1a | slate blue | 0.60 | 0.40 | |
RH PT2 | 1c brown | 1.20 | 0.60 | |
RH PT2a | sepia | 1.20 | 0.60 | |
RH PT3 | 5c red | 3.60 | 0.60 | |
RH PT4 | 6c blue-black | 2.50 | 0.70 | |
RH PT4a | Perf. 11½ x 12 | 10.00 | 3.60 | |
RH PT5 | 12c blue | 7.50 | 2.50 | |
RH PT5a | Perf. 11½ | 12.00 | 5.40 |
1890 Perf. 11½ or 11½ x 12.
RH-PT6. | RH-PT7. - Redrawn design, mouth, hair and '1' numerals. |
RH-PT8. | RH-PT9. | RH-PT10. |
RH-PT11. Smaller head than PT3. |
RH-PT12. | RH-PT13. | RH-PT14. | RH-PT15. |
RH # | Type. | Description | Mint | Used |
---|---|---|---|---|
RH PT6 | ¼c dark green | 0.60 | 0.40 | |
RH PT7 | 1c brown | 1.20 | 0.60 | |
RH PT7a | sepia | 1.20 | 0.60 | |
RH PT8 | 2c violet | 1.20 | 0.60 | |
RH PT9 | 2c purple | 1.20 | 0.60 | |
RH PT10 | 2c slate | 1.50 | 0.40 | |
RH PT10a | Perf. 11½ x 12 | 5.00 | 0.60 | |
RH PT11 | 5c red | 3.20 | 0.40 | |
RH PT11a | Perf. 11½ x 12 | 5.00 | 0.40 | |
RH PT12 | 10c brown | 3.60 | 0.60 | |
RH PT13 | 40c olive-brown | 7.50 | 1.20 | |
RH PT14 | 50c orange-yellow | 7.50 | 1.20 | |
RH PT15 | 60c black | 18.00 | 3.60 |
1890/1 Perf. 11½ or 11½ x 12.
RH-PT16. | RH-PT17. | RH-PT18. |
RH # | Type. | Description | Mint | Used |
---|---|---|---|---|
RH PT16 | ¼c in black on 12c blue Perf. 11½ x 12 | 0.60 | 0.60 | |
RH PT17 | ¼c in red on 12c blue Perf. 11½ x 12 | 0.60 | 0.60 | |
RH PT18 | 8c carmine-rose Perf. 11½ | 1.50 | 0.60 |
1891 Perf. 11½
RH-PT19. | RH-PT20. The Scott catalogue also shows a Specimen. |
RH-PT21. |
RH # | Type. | Description | Mint | Used |
---|---|---|---|---|
RH PT19 | 1p deep blue | 65.00 | 12.00 | |
RH PT20 | 5p ultramarine | 320.00 | 75.00 | |
RH PT21 | 20p green | 500.00 | 200.00 |
Prepared for use but not issued
I also have these curious items:
Victor Kneitschel lists post cards in Volume 2, Part 2, under "CARTAS POSTALES" (Page 794), but I don't see these.
The 10c could be an imperforate example of RH-PT12, or perhaps a cut-out from some kind of stationery.
The 1c is on slightly thicker paper with a postmark in 1892. I cannot find a perforated issue matching it in the Scott Catalog,
So I presume that this must be a cut-out from some kind of stationery. It looks like part of the bottom image on Kneitschel page 895.
Shortcuts to different sections | |||||
National Receiving | Other National | Provincial | Railway | Private Telegraphs | Seals |
Sending Forms:
1888 This is a cut-out from a pre-paid Telegraph Form printed by Juan H. Kidd y Cia of Buenos Aires.
I'm not sure of the date range.
Victor Kneitschel lists this in Volume 2, Part 2, under "TELEGRAMAS VALUADOS" (Page 877) .
He says it's on thick white paper size 174 x 242 mm, Lithographed 1888.
He lists 3 types: Type I. without watermark,
Type II. watermarked "TELÉGRAFO NACIONAL - REPÚBLICA ARGENTINA".
Type III. watermark as Type II, but with additional "IMP. KIDD & Co.".
Miguel Juárez Celman.
Here are a couple of examples at a quarter of my normal scale.
Click the images for half scale images.
![]() |
.![]() |
![]() |
A Specimen form from Les Bottomley. The form number "N. 17." is at top-left. Below the box for the words, it gives the printer as J. M. Kidd y Ca. Buenos Aires. |
An unused form from RL. At the bottom it gives the hours of despath as in summer 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. and in winter 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. |
An example used as a receipt for 12 Pesos in 1888. The charge appears to have been for P12.5, so perhaps it was 10c for blank forms. Image courtesy of Walter on eBay. |
Victor Kneitschel did not list Telegraph Forms without impressed stamps, so I will make a start by listing what I have.
National Receiving Forms (Fórm No. 3009):
This has "Fórmula 147 / 75.000-1919" at the top-left and was used in June 1919.
This has "Fórm No 3009" at the top-right and "266 - T. Gráf. C. y T. - 2/934" at the bottom-left and was used in March 1934. This is on very flimsy paper.
This has "Fórm No 3009" at the top-right and "266 - T. Gráf. C. y T. - 3/934" at the bottom-left and was also used in March 1934. This is also on very flimsy paper.
This is virtually identical to the last, but probably from a printing a month later.
This has "Fórm No 3009" at the top-right and "978 - T. Gráf. C. y T. - 5/939" at the bottom-left and was used in August 1939. This is on normal paper.
This has "Fórm No 3009" at the top-right and "1516 - T. Gráf. C. y T. - 9/939" at the bottom-left and was used in November 1939.
This has "Fórm No 3009" at the top-right and "273 - T. Gráf. C. y T. - 4/1943" at the bottom-left and was used in September 1943.
It now has "MINISTERIO DEL INTERIOR" at the top and the year is in full at the bottom.
This has "Fórm No 3009" at the top-right and "57 - T. Gráf. C. y T. - 1/1944" at the bottom-left and was used in April 1944.
It has "MINISTERIO DEL INTERIOR" at the top and the year is in full.
This has "Fórm No 3009" at the top-right and "654-T.Graf.CyT-3-949 - 100.000 B." at the bottom-left and was used in July 1949.
It has an additional "TELECOMUNICACIONES" at the top and the year is back to 3 digits at the bottom.
This has "Fórm No 3009" at the top-right and "1153-T.Graf.CyT-6-950 - 100.000 B." at the bottom-left and was used in September 1950.
This particular year has an additional "1950 - AÑO DEL LIBERTADOR GENERAL SAN MARTIN" at the top, the centenary of his death.
Under that is "MINISTERIO DE COMUNICACIONES"
This has "Fórm No 3009" at the top-right and "44-T.Graf.CyT-1-952 - 100.000 B." at the bottom-left and was used in March 1952.
This has "Fórm No 3009" at the top-right and "428-T.Graf.CyT-2-960 - 25.000 B." at the bottom-left and was used in May 1960.
This now has "SECRETARIA DE COMUNICACIONES". White paper.
Other National Forms:
This has the heading "MINISTERIO DE MARINA / SERVICIO RADIOTELEGRAFICO".
The top-left has "RADIO AL DESTINARIO", and the top-right has "IMPRESO 1402 1.000.000 / VIII 1930". It was used 15 September 1931.
This has the heading "RADIOTELEGRAMA" and below-left "MINISTERIO DE GUERRA", "Dirección General de Gendarmería Nacional",
and below "SERVICIO DE COMUNICACIONES". The bottom-left has "F. U1-001-800.000- 10/45-Russo Hnos." It was used 9 July 1947.
This has the heading "RADIOTELEGRAMA" and the same list of authorities, but the "Transmitido a las" suggests that it's a sending form
The message is in code, following a statement of the length. The bottom-left has "Fórm. U1-002-600.000- 8/45" It was used 8 July 1947.
Ref # | Form # | Imprint | Comment | Used |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arg-N-1919 | 147 | 75.000-1919 | Telégrafo de la Nación | 14/6/1919 |
Arg-N-1934-2 | 3009 | 266 - T. Gráf. C. y T. - 2/934 | Telégrafo de la Nación | 24/3/1934 |
Arg-N-1934-3 | 3009 | 266 - T. Gráf. C. y T. - 3/934 | Telégrafo de la Nación | 24/3/1934 |
Arg-N-1939-5 | 3009 | 978 - T. Gráf. C. y T. - 5/939 | Telégrafo de la Nación | 14/8/1939 |
Arg-N-1939-9 | 3009 | 1516 - T. Gráf. C. y T. - 9/939 | Telégrafo de la Nación | 29/11/1939, 30/11/1939 |
Arg-N-1943-4 | 3009 | 273 - T. Gráf. C. y T. - 4/1943 | Ministerio del Interior | 4/9/1943 |
Arg-N-1944-1 | 3009 | 57 - T. Gráf. C. y T. - 1/1944 | Ministerio del Interior | 9/4/1944 |
Arg-NT-1949-3 | 3009 | 654 - T. Gráf. C. y T. - 3/949 - 100.000 B | Telecomunicaciones, MdI | 14/7/1949 |
Arg-NT-1950-3 | 3009 | 1153 - T. Gráf. C. y T. - 6/950 - 100.000 B | Telecomunicaciones, MdC | 5/9.1950 |
Arg-NT-1952-1 | 3009 | 44 - T. Gráf. C. y T. - 1/952 - 100.000 B | Telecomunicaciones, MdC | 15/3/1952 |
Arg-NT-1960-2 | 3009 | 428 - T. Gráf. C. y T. - 2/960 - 25.000 B | Telecomunicaciones, SdC | 12/5/1960 |
Arg-M-1930-8 | 1402 | 1.000.000 / VIII 1930 | Ministerio de Marina | 10/4/1931, 15/9/1931 |
Arg-W-1-10/45 | U1-001 | 800.000- 10/45-Russo Hnos. | Ministerio de Guerra | 9/7/1947, 10/7/1947 |
Arg-W-2-8/45 | U1-002 | 600.000- 8/45 | Ministerio de Guerra | 6/7/1947, 8/7/1947 |
Provincial Forms:
This has the heading "TELÉGRAFO DE LA PROVINCIA DE BUENOS AIRES" at the top, and "Fórm. No 3"
The date has a very confusing year. I believe this seal was used from 1921 to 1936, so I would guess the date is meant to be 18 April 1929.
There are notes at the bottom, but no imprints.
This has larger wording at the top with a smaller form and no notes or imprint. Still "Fórm. No 3"
Dated 29 November 1939.
Almost identical to the last, except printed in red. Still "Fórm. No 3"
Dated 6 October 1945.
For Entre Rios
Dated 27 December 1950.
This image is courtesy of Humberto_Brumatti.
Ref # | Form # | Imprint | Comment | Used |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arg-BA-1 | 3 | - | Large black with notes. | 18/4/1929 ? |
Arg-BA-2 | 3 | - | Small black no notes. | 29/11/1939 |
Arg-BA-3 | 3 | - | Small red no notes. | 6/10/1945 |
Arg-ER-1 | ? | - | In black, no notes. | 27/12/1950 |
Railway Telegraph Forms:
Ferrocarril Nacional General Roca
The top-left has "T. E. 527 / EMPRESA NACIONAL DE TRANSPORTES / F. NACIONAL GRAL ROCA"
The top-right has "TELEGRAMA PUBLICO RECIBIDO" and the imprint "52030—100.000—9—59"
Dated 17 October 1959.
Ferrocarril General Belgrano
The top-right has "C. E. 44 - 16 x 21" which is presumably a form number.
It is dated 27 March 1961.
This is courtesy of Les Bottomly, as is the receipt below that was for sending this telegram.
The telegram was sent from Fortin Acha, a province of Buenos Aires to Vedia in the northwestern part of Buenos Aires.
It cost 108 Pesos to sed 80 words in total.
Private Telegraph Forms:
Western Telegraph Co. Receiving Forms:
This Western Telegraph Co. telegram has the same address in Buenos Aires as the River Plate Co. of Uruguay that it gained control of.
It is dated July 1914 (no day or number) and marked "VIA ASCENSIÓN".
Images courtesy of Bill Glover at Atlantic-Cable.com
This Western Telegraph Co. receipt has the same address in Buenos Aires and is dated 17 July 1914, so since it is associated and lack of evidence to the contrary,
It might be thought to belong with the telegram above. However this marked "VIA MADEIRA".
Images courtesy of Bill Glover at Atlantic-Cable.com
This Western Telegraph Co. telegram is very similar to earlier River Plate telegrams of Uruguay that it gained control of.
It is dated 19 May 1928.
The back lists the routes used for various telegram destinations. I don't see any via Ascensión.
Images courtesy of Bill Glover at Atlantic-Cable.com
This Western Telegraph Co. telegram of 6 September 1945 is clearly marked "Associated with Cable & Wireless Ltd." and "in connection with Western Union Telegraph Co" for North America,
as well as the "West Coast of America Telegraph Co. Ltd." for Chile, Peru and Bolivia.
Below the map is "Comunicaciones Mundiale
Via Imperial y Via Western Union ". The bottom left is marked 240.000-3-45
Image courtesy of Bill Glover at Atlantic-Cable.com
This Western Telegraph Co. telegram of 19 November 1952 has the same associations as the last, but without the map.
The back (sideways) has a list of station abbreviations.
Image courtesy of Bill Glover at Atlantic-Cable.com
This Western Telegraph Co. telegram of 24 December 1962 has simplified the wording and added a bit of colour.
Image courtesy of Bill Glover at Atlantic-Cable.com
A half-size image of a selection of seals used on telegrams of Argentina.
Steve Hiscocks made a start on cataloguing seals of the world in a book he published in 2007.
It was his hope to update it later, but unfortunately that was not to be.
His original book can be viewed at
Telegraph Seals: A World Catalogue. There are links from the pages to my updates.
Alternatively you can view the latest page for Argentina which now lists over 60 seals.
If anyone can provide scans to help with this, I am happy to give appropriate credit.
Last updated 9th. September 2023
©Copyright Steve Panting 2012/13/14/15/16/17/18/19/20/21/22/23 except where stated.
Permission is hereby granted to copy material for which the copyright is owned by myself, on condition that any data is not altered and this website is given credit.